The range of Bluetooth is 26 feet, while a Cell Phone need to connect distances of 2 to 45 miles to the nearest Cell-Tower. Take a guess which has lower radiation?


Cell phones use non-ionizing radiation, which doesn’t damage DNA the way ionizing radiation does.  The cell phone radiation operates more like very low power microwaves, but nobody really likes to think of leaning their face on a low-powered microwave.  Cell Phones require EMF's (Electro-Magnetic Frequencies) to connect distances of 2 to 45 miles to the nearest Cell Towers. Bluetooth chips transmit date 26 feet (10 meters) to communicate with Bluetooth enabled cell phones for listening to music or receiving a call.  Bluetooth earbuds emit only 10% of the radiation of Cell Phones, so use your head and change the bad habit of swamping your head with Cell Phone radiation.






Hundreds of medical research papers on consumer cell phone use have reached similar conclusions...cell phones should be kept more than 1/2" distance between the body at all times, even during calls. In other words, use the speaker or a Bluetooth earbud when talking on the phone.

Brilliant Buds strongly believes that taking positive action to protect our future health is essential.  One simple remedy is to break from the bad habit and convenience of pressing the cell phone against the ear, and instead get into the habit of using Bluetooth Earbuds or the phone's speaker. Naturally we believe a Covert Bluetooth Earbud, which blends into your fashion, is the best option.

To prove this, follow these basic steps on your own iPhone to see Apple's legal disclaimer regarding RF Exposure:

Radiation from cell phones can possibly cause cancer, according to the World Health Organization. The agency now lists mobile phone use in the same “carcinogenic hazard” category as lead, engine exhaust and chloroform.
— CNN - MAY 31, 2011
The power (and hence the radiofrequency exposure to a user) falls off rapidly with increasing distance from the handset. A person using a mobile phone 30–40 cm away from their body – for example when text messaging, accessing the Internet, or using a “hands free” device – will therefore have a much lower exposure to radiofrequency fields than someone holding the handset against their head.

BioInitiative 2012 

The BioInitiative 2012 Report has been prepared by 29 authors from ten countries*, ten holding medical degrees (MDs), 21 PhDs, and three MsC, MA or MPHs. Among the authors are three former presidents of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, and five full members of BEMS. One distinguished author is the Chair of the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation. Another is a Senior Advisor to the European Environmental Agency.

As in 2007, each author is responsible for their own chapter. The great strength of the BioInitiative Report ( is that it has been done independent of governments, existing bodies and industry professional societies that have clung to old standards. Precisely because of this, the BioInitiative Report presents a solid scientific and public health policy assessment that is evidence-based.

There is reinforced scientific evidence of risk from chronic exposure to low-intensity electromagnetic fields and to wireless technologies (radiofrequency radiation including microwave radiation). The levels at which effects are reported to occur is lower by hundreds of times in comparison to 2007. The range of possible health effects that are adverse with chronic exposures has broadened. There has been a big increase in the number of studies looking at the effects of cell phones (on the belt, or in the pocket of men radiating only on standby mode) and from wireless laptops on impacts to sperm quality and motility; and sperm death (fertility and reproduction). In other new studies of the fetus, infant and young child, and child-in-school – there are a dozen or more new studies of importance. There is more evidence that such exposures damage DNA, interfere with DNA repair, evidence of toxicity to the human genome (genes), more worrisome effects on the nervous system (neurology) and more and better studies on the effects of mobile phone base stations (wireless antenna facilities or cell towers) that report lower RFR levels over time can result in adverse health impacts. Importantly, some very large studies were completed on brain tumor risk from cell phone use. The 13- country World Health Organization Interphone Final study (2010) produced evidence (although highly debated among fractious members of the research committee) that cell phone use at 10 years or longer, with approximately 1,640 hours of cumulative use of a cell and/or cordless phone approximately doubles glioma risk in adults. Gliomas are aggressive, malignant tumors where the average life-span following diagnosis is about 400 days. That brain tumors should be revealed in epidemiological studies at ONLY 10 or more years is significant; x-ray and other ionizing radiation exposures that can also cause brain tumors take nearly 15-20 years to appear making radiofrequency/microwave radiation from cell phones a very effective cancer-causing agent. Studies by Lennart Hardell and his research team at Orebro University in Sweden later showed that children who start using a mobile phone in early years have more than a 5-fold (more than a 500%) risk for developing a glioma by the time they are in the 20-29 year age group. This has significant ramifications for public health intervention.

Credits to The BioInitiative Report 2012